Hegemonic and Other Masculinities in Local Social Contexts

University of Melbourne, Australia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dean.lusher{at}unimelb.edu.au.

	Abstract

This article is a theoretical examination of Connell’s social theory of gender, discussing how hegemonic, complicit, subordinate, and marginalized masculinities interact and relate to one another in the men’s everyday lives in particular social contexts. Connell’s theory is articulated in global terms that need to be localized to examine the actual interactions of men with one another. The theory implies a multilevel framework that the authors develop more explicitly. They investigate two interrelated theoretical concerns: (a) inadequately detailed interdependencies between structural, individual, and cultural factors with respect to masculinities, and (b) the lack of contextualization of masculinities in specific relational settings. The authors suggest that theoretical insights gained from social network theory and analysis allow such issues to be addressed and assist in local-level accounts of gendered power relations. The authors conclude by specifying Connell’s theory into particular, testable hypotheses for use with statistical models for social networks.
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?