This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hirose, A. Articles by Kei-ho Pih, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Men Who Strike and Men Who Submit: Hegemonic and Marginalized Masculinities in Mixed Martial Arts

¹ University of Colorado Denver
² NA

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: akihiko.hirose{at}ucdenver.edu.

	Abstract

While the recent conceptualization of hegemonic masculinity allows for the emergence of multiple masculinities, a significant ambiguity remains in theorizing the relationships between hegemonic and "alternative" forms of masculinity. In the relatively newly institutionalized sport of mixed martial arts (MMA), the relationship between the two polarized, competing technical styles—striking and submission—appears to demonstrate the competition between hegemonic and marginalized masculinities. This article argues that the distinction is predicated on the process of maintaining and negotiating a specific form of hegemonic masculinity that interacts with East Asian masculinities that are often feminized, yet selectively authorized by their white American counterpart. This article provides a theoretical discussion of marginalized masculinities identified in MMA and challenges the perceived characteristics of hegemonic masculinity—particularly its singularity and impenetrability—by suggesting a more relational, antiessentialist approach.

First published on September 23, 2009
Men and Masculinities 2009, doi:10.1177/1097184X09344417


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?