Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Men and Masculinities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VITELLONE, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Condoms and the Making of "Testosterone Man"

A Cultural Analysis of the Male Sex Drive in AIDS Research on Safer Heterosex

NICOLE VITELLONE

Australian National University

Heterosexual men's apparent aversion to wearing condoms in AIDS culture has lead a range of analysts and researchers to ask why this is the case. Many feminists have suggested that the answer to this question lies in the way the practice of unsafe heterosex—without condoms—is key for the constitution of a hegemonic heterosexual masculine self-identity. Moreover, it is often argued that what is at issue for understanding the practice of unsafe heterosex is the male sex drive discourse. Conversely, it is usually assumed that the cultural phenomena of the male sex drive—as a spontaneous, uninterruptible, powerful, hydraulic force—is radically challenged by the object of the condom, an object which is perceived to disrupt the natural performance of the male sex drive. In this article, the author questions the male sex drive-unsafe heterosex thesis through a reinterpretation of AIDS research findings on the practice of safer heterosex with condoms.

Key Words: AIDS culture • heterosexuality • safer (hetero)sex campaigns • the condom • feminist theory and the male sex drive discourse

Men and Masculinities, Vol. 3, No. 2, 152-167 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1097184X00003002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
S. Nyanzi, B. Nyanzi-Wakholi, and B. Kalina
Male Promiscuity: The Negotiation of Masculinities by Motorbike Taxi-Riders in Masaka, Uganda
Men and Masculinities, October 1, 2009; 12(1): 73 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
N. VITELLONE
Condoms and the Making of Sexual Differences in AIDS Heterosexual Culture
Body Society, September 1, 2002; 8(3): 71 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]