Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Men and Masculinities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Totten, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Girlfriend Abuse as a Form of Masculinity Construction among Violent, Marginal Male Youth

Mark Totten

Youth Services Bureau of Ottawa

This study focuses on the development and effect of familial and gender ideologies on the masculine identities of thirty marginal male youth aged thirteen to seventeen years, all of whom were gang members or belonged to violent male peer groups. Qualitative, indepth interviews uncovered protest and negative masculine identities. Their abusive behavior, directed at girlfriends, gays, and racial minorities, is suggested to be a response to blocked access to traditional institutional benefits of patriarchy. Violence compensated for perceived threats to their masculine identities. The construction of masculinity was an ongoing process for these boys, negotiated and developed on a daily basis using available resources in their social space location. Significant differences within the sample explain the variation in the degree to which they embraced patriarchal-authoritarian models of family and gender, and variation in the forms and seriousness of their physical and sexual violence.

Key Words: youth violence • gangs • girlfriend abuse • masculinity • child maltreatment

Men and Masculinities, Vol. 6, No. 1, 70-92 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1097184X03253138


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
R. Contreras
"Damn, Yo--Who's That Girl?": An Ethnographic Analysis of Masculinity in Drug Robberies
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, August 1, 2009; 38(4): 465 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
M. J. McCarry
Justifications and Contradictions: Understanding Young People's Views of Domestic Abuse
Men and Masculinities, January 1, 2009; 11(3): 325 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indian Journal of Gender StudiesHome page
K. Charsley
Vulnerable Brides and Transnational Ghar Damads: Gender, Risk and 'Adjustment' among Pakistani Marriage Migrants to Britain
Indian Journal of Gender Studies, October 1, 2005; 12(2-3): 381 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]