This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Breu, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Going Blood-Simple in Poisonville

Hard-Boiled Masculinity in Dashiell Hammett’s Red Harvest

Illinois State University

This article examines the representation and critique of what it terms hard-boiled masculinity as an exemplary form of modern masculinity in Dashiell Hammett’s Red Harvest. The novel presents hard-boiled masculinity as violent, rationalized, and largely purged of interiority and affect. Its representation of masculinity is organized around a form of split narration in which the affective detachment and seeming rationality of the firstperson narration produces a textual unconscious in which the affect purged fromthe surface of the narrative is projected on to and returns in the shape of various gendered, racialized, and nationalized others. After explicating this split narration, and suggesting its links to the advent of Taylorism and incipient Fordism in the 1920s, the article charts the political costs of this displacement of affect and the form of masculinity it constructs.

Key Words: hard-boiled masculinity • gendered violence • cultural fantasy • melancholia • textual unconscious • instrumental rationality • Fordism • Taylorism • corporate capitalism • allegory

Men and Masculinities, Vol. 7, No. 1, 52-76 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1097184X03257449


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?